Freight bills get paid when the paperwork matches. Quick Receivable tracks every open freight invoice, accessorial short-pay, document request, and payment commitment inside Salesforce, so your billing team stops rebuilding the same load history for every customer query.
Thousands of small invoices, each one tied to a load, a document, and a rate somebody may dispute.
In freight the invoice is rarely refused outright. It is reduced, queried, or held pending paperwork, which is a slower and more expensive problem. Quick Receivable is the logistics build of the same B2B accounts receivable software used across manufacturing, distribution, and construction, shaped around load-level billing and document-driven delay.
Order reference, purchase order, contract status, disputed amount, and days past due.
Aging buckets for 30, 60, 90, and 120+ days, with account aging running much further.
Proof of delivery and statement requests arriving into a categorized shared inbox.
Early, due, past due, and final notice running automatically on every freight bill.
Detention, fuel, and layover deductions logged with a category, owner, and resolver.
Applications, limit requests, and a 0 to 100 score before extending more capacity.
One remittance split across dozens of freight bills, marked Applied or Partially Applied.
Dashboards for total AR, overdue AR, current due, DSO, and results by collector.
Figures below describe how the platform works and what it has delivered in production, not projected savings.
Reminder cycle running from early notice, through due and past due, to final notice and broken promise
Credit risk score per customer, combining Equifax report data, payment timing, broken promises and disputes
ERP delta synchronization in a live enterprise deployment, replacing a once-daily refresh cycle
Months to migrate a legacy collections platform with open disputes and collector notes intact
The last two figures come from a live deployment with WillScot, North America's leading provider of modular space and portable storage solutions, a business moving and billing equipment across the country. The full AR transformation case study covers the integration and data migration in detail.
The loss in logistics is rarely a bad debt write-off. It is fifty dollars off a thousand invoices that nobody had time to contest.
That pattern is what pushes billing teams toward accounts receivable collections software once the invoice count outgrows the spreadsheet.
Detention, layover, and fuel adjustments are removed at payment with no claim raised.
Payment waits on a delivery document that was requested weeks ago by someone else.
One customer short-pays every load by a small amount and nobody totals it.
Capacity keeps being committed to a customer whose payment behaviour is deteriorating.
Billing staff spend the morning on document requests and never reach the aging report.
One payment settles ninety freight bills and reduces eleven of them without explanation.
Asset-based carriers, brokers, and warehouse operators across the United States, billing shippers, retailers, and manufacturers on very different terms.
Long-haul lanes, detention and layover charges, and dedicated contract billing.
Very high invoice counts at low values, with reweigh and reclass adjustments.
Margin squeezed between carrier pay and customer terms on every load.
Per diem, chassis, and demurrage charges that customers routinely contest.
Storage, handling, and pick fees billed monthly against a service agreement.
Thousands of small deliveries billed to retail and appliance customers.
Temperature claims, equipment charges, and rejected load disputes.
Duty, disbursement, and third-party charges recovered on the same invoice.
Freight bills with order reference and dispute flag
Freight payment teams and audit providers match on references, not on invoice numbers. When the order reference or purchase order is missing, the bill is not disputed, it is simply parked until someone supplies it.
A carrier chasing individual freight bills will never catch up, because the volume regenerates every week. Ranking customers by exposure turns an impossible list into a manageable one, and it exposes the accounts that are quietly reducing every invoice.
To size the delay in cash terms first, the DSO calculator takes two minutes.
Customers ranked by past due and priority score
Accessorial short-pay tracked to resolution
Detention billed at four hours and paid at two. A fuel surcharge calculated on a different index. A reweigh adjustment applied without notice. Individually these are small enough to ignore, and that is precisely why they accumulate into real money across a year of loads.
Where deductions run at volume, reason-code reporting is handled in AR deductions management software.
A large share of freight collections work is not collection at all. It is customers asking for a copy of something. Handled through personal mailboxes, those requests arrive twice, get answered once, and the invoice stays open through both.
Document and statement requests in one inbox
Incoming replies classified and routed
At load-level invoice volume, the inbox is the bottleneck. A remittance advice, a detention query, and an automated out-of-office all look the same in an unread list, and the query is the one that costs money if it waits.
Reminder timing alongside that flow is configured in payment reminder software.
Freight credit decisions are made quickly and revisited rarely. A broker that pays in sixty days instead of thirty does not trigger a review, it just quietly doubles the exposure carried against that name.
Your team keeps the final decision under your own policy, with credit management in the same place collectors work.
Customer credit application and risk scorecard
One remittance split across many freight bills
Freight payments arrive in batches, frequently through a third-party payment provider, with the detail supplied separately. Matching them by hand is where short-pays disappear, because a partially settled bill looks paid unless somebody checks the line.
That trail is what keeps month-end cash application defensible when auditors ask.
The team booking the freight and the team billing it are usually looking at different screens.
Logistics sells capacity on credit, often at speed. A customer service rep accepting another load has no natural reason to know that the same customer has eleven open short-pays. Putting aging, claims, and credit usage on the account they already open changes that without adding a process. The trade-offs between native and integrated AR architecture come down to the rows below.
| Working method | Bolt-on AR tool beside the CRM | Quick Receivable inside Salesforce |
|---|---|---|
| Exposure before booking a load | Finance knows, the rep does not | Aging, credit usage and score on the account everyone opens |
| Short-pay history by customer | Tracked per invoice, if at all | Open claims and dispute rate visible on the customer record |
| Data freshness | Typically once daily | Delta loads run multiple times a day in production deployments |
| Document and statement requests | Personal mailboxes and forwarded threads | Shared AR inbox with categorized, classified email |
| Reporting | A second BI layer or manual exports | Salesforce dashboards, exportable to PDF or Excel |
Aging, reminders, claims, credit scoring, and cash application are modules of one accounts receivable feature set, deployed together rather than bought separately.
It manages the receivable side of the billing cycle for carriers, brokers, and logistics providers, covering freight bill visibility, AR aging, collections, payment reminders, accessorial short-pays and disputes, customer credit risk, cash application, and reporting. Quick Receivable does this inside Salesforce, so the balance sits on the same customer record your commercial team uses.
Each deduction is logged as a dispute against the freight bill with a category, owner, resolver, and resolution code. Days to identify and days to resolve are tracked, reminders can pause while the claim is open, and a closed claim can be reopened while keeping its history.
Yes. Work is organised by customer rather than by individual freight bill, with accounts ranked by past due balance, credit limit, or priority score, and reminders running automatically on each invoice through the full cycle.
Requests arrive into a shared AR inbox grouped into categories including statement, dispute, remittance, promised, invoice request, purchase order update, and out of office. Documents uploaded to an account can be queried in plain language to find the detail a customer is asking about.
Yes. A credit application captures business name, tax ID, legal entity type, and Dun and Bradstreet number, and links to a scorecard combining Equifax credit report data with payment timing, broken promises, and dispute history into a score from 0 to 100. Your team still makes the final decision under your own credit policy.
Available remittance information matches the receipt to the correct invoices. The payment splits across them, each match is marked Applied or Partially Applied, and remittance mapping records the split so any applied amount traces back to the original cash receipt.
Truckload and LTL carriers, freight brokerage and third-party logistics, drayage and intermodal, warehousing and fulfillment, final mile and courier, cold chain and specialized haulage, and freight forwarding and customs brokerage.
No. It handles the receivable side and works alongside the system where loads and freight bills originate. Invoice records carry references including order number, purchase order number, and contract status, and in one enterprise deployment delta synchronization runs three times daily.
Walk through customer aging, accessorial short-pays, document requests, and batch remittance matching against your own process. No preparation needed.
Schedule a Free Demo