10 Best GetPaid Alternatives for AR Automation

HighRadius is the most-evaluated enterprise AR platform and a common consideration for GetPaid customers looking for a like-for-like enterprise replacement. Its breadth covers collections, cash application, credit, and deductions. However, it carries the same cost and complexity issues that often led teams to question GetPaid in the first place: $80,000 to $150,000+ in year-one costs, a mandatory SI partner, and a 6 to 12 month go-live timeline. For Salesforce-based teams, it also introduces a second standalone system outside of Salesforce.

Billtrust offers a broad order-to-cash suite and is one of the most commonly evaluated GetPaid replacements for enterprise teams. It covers the full AR workflow from credit decisioning through cash application. Teams considering Billtrust should note that it is currently going through corporate changes and that Salesforce integration is via API, not native. Implementation timelines run 4 to 6 months with professional services required.

Gaviti focuses on collections automation and is a lighter-weight option for mid-market GetPaid users who want to avoid the cost and complexity of enterprise platforms. Its implementation is fast and it handles dunning workflows and payment reminders well. For teams that need deep dispute management or complex ERP integration at GetPaid's scale, Gaviti may feel limited.

Quadient AR bridges the gap between mid-market and enterprise, offering AI-driven payment predictions, cash application, and customer self-service portals. For GetPaid customers evaluating replacements, Quadient provides broader feature coverage than Gaviti while being less expensive than HighRadius. Like all other options on this list aside from Quick Receivable, it is not Salesforce-native.

Esker is the company that acquired and is now decommissioning GetPaid. Their AR suite is the migration path they would prefer GetPaid customers to take, which creates an obvious conflict of interest worth acknowledging. Esker's platform covers AR alongside AP and order management, making it a reasonable choice for organizations that want to consolidate multiple finance processes. However, teams that chose GetPaid specifically for its collections depth often find Esker's AR module to be less specialized. Salesforce-native integration is not part of Esker's architecture.

Versapay takes a collaborative approach to AR, where customers interact directly with a self-service portal to view invoices, raise disputes, and submit payments. This model reduces collector workload by shifting routine interactions to the customer side. It is a reasonable GetPaid alternative for teams that prioritize customer payment experience. For teams that need deep internal collections workflow management at GetPaid's scale, Versapay is less depth-complete.

Invoiced targets companies with subscription or recurring billing models, covering invoice generation, automated payment reminders, cash application, and a customer portal. For GetPaid customers with project-based or high-volume complex AR, Invoiced will likely feel under-powered. It is best suited for SaaS or services companies with straightforward billing patterns rather than the asset-intensive, dispute-heavy environments GetPaid was designed for.

Upflow combines AR automation with cash flow visibility in a modern, clean interface. It is a solid option for GetPaid customers at companies under $100M in revenue who want a simpler, faster-to-deploy solution without enterprise complexity. For teams managing high invoice volumes with complex dispute workflows, ERP integrations, or SAP dependencies, Upflow will lack the depth required for a GetPaid-equivalent replacement.

Tesorio leads with cash flow forecasting, using machine learning to predict payment timing and working capital requirements. Collections automation is a secondary capability layered on top of the forecasting core. For GetPaid customers whose primary need was collections workflow management and dispute resolution, Tesorio's prioritization of forecasting over collections depth makes it a partial replacement rather than a full one.